![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
News April 11, 2007 Statement of James M. Loy, Admiral USCG (Ret.), National Co-Chairman protectingamerica.org, before the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs United States Senate Thank you Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Shelby and members of the committee. My name is James M. Loy. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today in my capacity as co-chairman of ProtectingAmerica.Org, an organization committed to finding better ways to prepare and protect American families from the devastation caused by natural catastrophes. My fellow co-chairman is James Lee Witt, the former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Our coalition's over 200 members include first responders like the American Red Cross, emergency management officials, insurers like State Farm and Allstate, municipalities, small businesses, Fortune 100 companies and thousands of private citizens. The membership is broad and diverse and includes members from virtually every state in the nation. ProtectingAmerica.org was formed in the summer of 2005 to raise the national awareness about the important responsibility we all have to prepare and protect consumers, families, businesses and communities. We hope to build a campaign to create a comprehensive, national catastrophe management solution that protects homes and property at a lower cost, improves preparedness, and reduces the financial burden on consumers and taxpayers – all in an effort to speed recovery, protect property, save money and save lives. Though we come from all walks of life, we share a common belief that the current system of destroy – rebuild and hope in the aftermath of extraordinary natural disasters is fatally flawed. Fundamental to the current system is the vain belief that "it won’t happen here." This denial, which is pervasive from homeowners to officeholders, has provided us all with the false comfort that, while we would like to prepare for the possibility of catastrophe, the likelihood of an event actually happening "here" is so remote that we should spend our time and resources on other more immediate and pressing problems. This denial undermines efforts to prepare in advance of catastrophe. The simple fact is that catastrophe can and does occur virtually anywhere in this country. Let me give you some quick facts that should crystallize the urgent threat posed by natural catastrophe in America:
Catastrophe preparedness, prevention and recovery are not a challenge limited only to Florida and the Gulf Coast, nor to the earthquake zone of northern California.
Climatologists are united in their observation that surface water temperatures are up and that we are in a weather cycle that is likely to last for many years, possibly several decades, and will include hurricanes with greater force and frequency than even those we have experienced in recent years. Seismologists are similarly united in their observation that we are overdue for a major earthquake along many of the fault lines that run along our Pacific Coast or, as in the case of the New Madrid Fault, transect the very heartland of this nation. Simply put, catastrophe can happen here, it has happened here and there is no doubt that it will happen again. It is a question not of "if" but "when" and "how bad." The costs of any of those catastrophes repeating themselves would be enormous.
The effect of such tremendous losses would be felt through our entire national economy. When catastrophe strikes, our after-the-fact response programs and protocols do a remarkable job in getting victims into shelters and in mobilizing emergency supplies and personnel so that the situation does not worsen. All Americans, regardless of whether or not they have been victimized by catastrophe, owe our first responders an enormous debt of gratitude. Their service is invaluable. While little can be done to completely eliminate the crisis mode, ProtectingAmerica.Org believes that it can, and must, be mitigated. Clearly, programs that would improve preparedness, increase public education, enhance prevention and mitigation programs, and augment support for first responder programs would improve our national capability to prepare and protect those of us who live in harm's way. Public education programs would help homeowners to make necessary plans and be prepared in advance of an emergency. Mitigation programs such as strong, enforceable building codes and effective retrofitting programs would improve the integrity of catastrophe-prone structures so that damage would be minimized if catastrophe strikes. An increase in first responder funding would help finance these critical programs that too often get shortchanged in the give-and-take of local budgeting. Studies in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina suggest that the current after-the-fact recovery funding for catastrophes results in an enormous taxpayer subsidy for uninsured and underinsured properties. In fact, a Brookings Institution study published in March of last year found that of the first $85 billion in taxpayer dollars spent on Katrina recovery efforts, more than $10 billion went to cover losses for uninsured or underinsured properties. ProtectingAmerica.Org believes that in addition to minimizing the extent of catastrophic losses through prevention and mitigation programs, we must also reduce the taxpayer subsidy of recovery efforts, ensure the adequacy of recovery dollars, and improve the delivery of those critical funds to homeowners. ProtecingAmerica.Org has been advocating the establishment of a stronger public-private partnership as part of a comprehensive, integrated solution at the local, state and national levels. The solution would include privately funded catastrophe funds in catastrophe-prone states that provide more protection at lower cost to consumers. Much like the 401k retirement savings program, these CAT funds would grow tax-free, thus able to generate higher levels of reserves to provide greater levels of coverage in a shorter timeframe. These CAT funds would serve as a backstop to the private insurance market and would generate investment earnings that, in addition to helping to pay claims in the aftermath of a mega-catastrophe, would be used for mitigation, prevention, preparation and first responder programs. We have also been advocating the creation of a national catastrophe fund that would serve as a backstop to participating state catastrophe funds in the event of a mega-catastrophe. Those state catastrophe funds would be financed through mandatory contributions by insurance companies in each of those states in an amount that reflects the catastrophe risk of the policies that they write in each state. The state funds would be required to set aside a minimum of $10 million up to a maximum of 35% of investment income for prevention and mitigation programs. Qualified state funds would be able to purchase re-insurance from the national program. Rates for this coverage would be actuarially based and would only be available to state programs that have established the prevention and mitigation funding as described above. In the event that a catastrophe strikes, private insurers would be required to meet all of their obligations to their policyholders. Should catastrophic losses exceed those obligations, the state catastrophe fund would be utilized. In the event of an extraordinary catastrophe, the national backstop program would provide benefits to the state and help pay remaining claims. Because this is a state-by-state program based entirely on risk, the likelihood of a taxpayer subsidy is virtually eliminated. This approach requires pre-event funding and relies on private dollars from insurance companies in the areas that are most exposed to catastrophe. Because this program relies on the traditional private market for paying claims, the inherent inefficiencies and bureaucracy in a government-run program are eliminated. Because this program requires states to fund meaningful prevention and mitigation programs, catastrophe planning, protection and preparation will take place before the onslaught of catastrophe and will be in a state of continuous and rigorous improvement. ProtectingAmerica.org is cognizant of readiness and preparedness efforts underway by DHS, the Red Cross and the Council on Excellence in Government and is working hard to compliment that work. All of these elements are contained in legislation currently pending in both the House and Senate. This needs to be a top national priority. It reflects strong leadership to act before the next crisis. There is urgency and opportunity to act. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you, again, for taking the time to consider and discuss this important subject. I would be happy to answer any questions that you may have. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2006 The Cohen Group | 500 Eighth St., NW Suite 200, Washington, DC 20004 | Voice: 202-863-7200 | Fax: 202-863-7800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||